| The Constitution |
In Search of the Best Constitution
|
|
Rulers
|
Right (Common Interest)
|
Wrong (Personal Interest)
|
|
One
|
Kingship
|
Tyranny
|
|
Few
|
Aristocracy
|
Oligarchy
|
|
Many
|
Polity
|
Democracy
|
Kingship, the first "right" constitution identified by Aristotle, is rule by a single man who becomes a ruler through heredity or election. Aristotle thought kings have the advantage of acting quickly and decisively in emergencies. Still, kings are subject to emotions and cannot handle all necessary matters at once. For these reasons, Aristotle argued, kings should not possess absolute power. They should be limited by the law. When kings rule, Aristotle says in the Politics, "they should be made 'law guardians' or ministers of the law."
What happens when a king uses his power to benefit only himself and not the common interest? In this case a king becomes a tyrant. Tyranny, the corrupt form of kingship, is the first example of a "wrong" constitution. Tyrants use force to oppress all others and are interested only in their own personal gain.
Aristotle classified aristocracy as one of his "right" constitutions. Aristocracies are societies governed by a small group of men chosen because they are the "best." In Aristotle's view, aristocrats are men of wealth and leisure who have developed their minds so that they have superior intellects. Aristotle believed that these men would only rule for the benefit of all. But when an aristocracy rules for the benefit of the rich, it becomes an oligarchy, another one of Aristotle's "wrong" constitutions. Oligarchies were one of the common forms of government found in the Greek city-states.
During his lifetime in Athens, Aristotle lectured and wrote on politics at his school. Even though Athens was a democratic city-state, Aristotle was never a fan of democracy and he included it as one of his "wrong" constitutions. Aristotle believed democracy meant that every free-born man had the right and duty to help rule the city. Thus, both rich and poor, educated and ignorant, intelligent and dull-witted could attend the Assembly meetings, vote and hold public office.
Aristotle saw danger in this form of government. The poor majority would always be able to outvote the wealthy and the best. The poor could ruin a state by overtaxing the rich and confiscating their property. In other words, a democracy could easily become a tyranny with many heads.
Aristotle also feared the rise of demagogues in a democracy. Demagogues are power-seekers who gained influence by appealing to the emotions of the people.
Even with his reservations, Aristotle was not totally against democracy. "There is this to be said for the Many," he wrote in the Politics. "Each of them by himself may not be of a good quality; but when they all come together it is possible that they may surpass...the quality of the few best."
Aristotle found things to criticize about all the "right" and "wrong" constitutions discussed above. So what did he decide was the best constitution?
He decided on a balanced one based on the Greek principle that the extremes in life should be avoided in favor of the moderate middle. One should neither eat too much nor too little. One should neither exercise excessively nor spend most of the time sleeping. As in life, so with government, Aristotle believed.
Aristotle concluded that mixing two extreme "wrong" constitutions, oligarchy and democracy, would result in a moderate "right" one. In this case, two "wrongs" would make a "right." Aristotle called this moderate mixed constitution a polity and believed that it would best serve the common interest of all citizens in most states.
At Philadelphia some 2,000 years after Aristotle's time, a group of men were also searching for the best constitution. America was in many ways quite different from Aristotle's Greece. For one thing, the 13 American states were a lot bigger than Athens or any of the other ancient Greek city-states. Still, the framers at Philadelphia understood Aristotle's political ideas and passed them on to us in the document they created. Among these ideas are the belief in the rule of law, moderation and a government that serves the common interest of all citizens.
1. Contrast democracy in ancient Athens with democracy in the United States today.
2. The world has changed a great deal since Aristotle's time. Are there still forms of government similar to the ones he described? Tyranny? Oligarchy? Demagogues?
3. What do each of the following quotations from Aristotle's Politics mean?
a. "Where the laws are not sovereign, there is no constitution."
b. "The best way of life is one which consists in the mean."
c. "The good in the sphere of politics is justice; and justice consists in what tends to promote the common interest."
The complete text of the U.S. Constitution
1. Meet in small discussion groups to do this activity.
2. Imagine that at some time in the future only two countries exist in the world: Freeland and Leaderland. Since you have nowhere else to go, you must choose one of these countries in which to live. Which one would you pick? Why?
Freeland
In this country the people are free to do whatever they want. Children and adults may decide for themselves if they want to go to school, work, sleep all day, play at the beach, watch videos, get drunk, etc. There are no laws of any kind in Freeland.
Leaderland
In this country there are many laws which all have been made by one man: the Leader. The people of this country are told by the Leader and his assistants where to live, how to dress, what jobs to hold, what newspapers to read, and whom to vote for at election time. The people lead safe and orderly lives...as long as they follow the Leader.
3. After discussing the choices above in small groups, meet as a class and vote on which country you prefer. Then discuss the following questions:
Barker, Ernest, ed. and trans. The Politics of Aristotle. New York: Oxford University press, 1962.
Hornblower, Simon. The Greek World. London: Methuen & Co., 1983.